🔗 Share this article

The recent US security policy document presents a misguided view of Europe. The document asserts that open-border policies and what it terms "progressive" agendas pose an grave threat to European civilization. Yet, this perspective is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The actual challenge facing the EU is not cultural but technological and economic backwardness.

The Stark Growth Gap Between Europe and the US

The data paint a sobering contrast. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP surged by eighty-seven percent, compared to a paltry thirteen and a half percent growth for the EU. Over this time, European income per person dropped from 76.5% to just 50% of the US level. Remarkably, even Mississippi now has a higher per capita income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Today, about half of the world’s top fifty tech companies are US-based, while only four are from Europe.

The Innovation Shortfall: The Core Question

This widening disparity is driven by superior efficiency gains in the United States, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The landscape of world technology dominance is overwhelmingly American. Over the past fifty years, hundreds of American startups have scaled into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, compared with only fourteen in the European continent.

This gap prompts a vital issue: As the competition for future industries like semiconductors, AI, and fusion energy, what is Europe positioned? Most analysts agree it is largely a contest between two between the United States and China, with Europe entering at a significant disadvantage.

Root Causes of the Continent's Technological Lag

A number of key reasons account for this technological divide.

• Venture Capital: The US boasts a much more robust and more dynamic system for financing new ventures. Europe still lacks a genuine capital markets union, a factor that caps the scale of new firms.
• Regulatory Fragmentation: Excessive and fragmented regulation hinder European business. A US startup can introduce a service under one regulatory framework to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population, is divided among 27 different national systems, creating huge market obstacles.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In some EU nations, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has eroded its capacity for pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Grounds for Hopefulness

Despite these challenges, there are causes for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the existential challenge and have begun to propose serious reform. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the single market point to the necessity of major reforms.

With the right policies and rule changes, these assets might enable much higher degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe retains significant strengths: skilled human capital, excellent schools and universities, and world-class research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these elements have the potential to trigger a surge of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating next-generation tech, it can still significantly boost productivity by implementing and tailoring innovations from other regions.

A Critical Juncture

Europe now stands at a critical moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "slowly, then all at once". To date, the continent's slide in innovation has been steady. But, without decisive action to address its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.